4.6 Article

IL-33 Induces Nuocytes and Modulates Liver Injury in Viral Hepatitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 190, 期 11, 页码 5666-5675

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300117

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI078878, T35 AI078878, R01 AI069142, AI69142] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecules containing damage-associated molecular patterns play an important role in many pathogenic processes. In this study, our aim was to investigate the role of IL-33, a damage-associated molecular pattern molecule, in adenovirus (Ad)-induced liver inflammation. Ad-infected mice exhibited a steadily increased IL-33 and its receptor IL-1R-like 1 expression in the liver during the first week of infection. Treatment of exogenous IL-33 resulted in a great decrease in the serum alanine aminotransferase levels and the number of Councilman bodies in the liver. Attenuated liver injury by IL-33 correlated with an increase in T regulatory cells but with a decrease in macrophages, dendritic cells, and NK cells in the liver. IL-33 enhanced both type 1 (IL-2 and IFN-gamma) and type 2 (IL-5 and IL-13) immune responses in infected mice. However, IL-33 inhibited TNF-alpha expression in hepatic T cells and macrophages, and significantly reduced TNF-alpha levels in the liver. We found that in addition to its direct effects, IL-33 strongly induced novel nuocytes in the livers and spleens of infected mice. When cocultured with nuocytes, hepatic T cells and macrophages expressed lower levels of TNF-alpha. The IL-33 treated mice also demonstrated a slight delay, but no significant impairment, in eliminating an intrahepatic infection with Ad. In conclusion, this study reveals that IL-33 acts as a potent immune stimulator and a hepatoprotective cytokine in acute viral hepatitis. Its direct immunoregulatory functions and ability to induce novel nuocytes further suggest to us that it may be a potentially promising therapeutic candidate for the management of viral hepatitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据