4.6 Article

TGF-β Promotes Immune Responses in the Presence of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 192, 期 1, 页码 103-109

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302164

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Science [XDA 01040107, XDA 01040110, GJHZ201307]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2010CB945600, 2011DFA30630]
  3. National Science and Technology Project of China [31010103908, 81273316]
  4. Bureau of International Cooperation
  5. Shanghai Municipal Key Projects of Basic Research [12JC1409200]
  6. Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation [12ZR1452600]
  7. Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2012KIP202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) possess potent immunosuppression capacity and could exert strong therapeutic effects in many diseases, especially inflammatory disorders, in animal models and clinical settings. Although inflammatory cytokines are critical in inducing the immune modulatory properties of MSCs, detailed molecular mechanisms are yet to be fully understood. TGF-beta is a well-known anti-inflammatory cytokine and exists in various inflammatory processes; therefore, we investigated whether it could synergize with MSCs in suppressing immune responses. To our surprise, we found that TGF-beta actually reversed the immunosuppressive effect of MSCs on anti-CD3 activated splenocytes. Using TGF-beta unresponsive MSCs, we demonstrated that the TGF-beta directly acted on MSCs. Furthermore, we showed that the effect of TGF-beta is exerted through inhibiting inflammatory cytokines induced inducible NO synthase (iNOS) expression in a SMAD3-dependent manner. Interestingly, we found that TGF-beta produced by MSCs could act in an autocrine manner to reduce inflammatory cytokine-induced inducible NO synthase expression by MSCs themselves. Therefore, our study revealed a previously unrecognized property of TGF-beta in promoting immune responses in the presence of MSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据