4.6 Article

Canonical and Noncanonical Wnt Proteins Program Dendritic Cell Responses for Tolerance

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 190, 期 12, 页码 6126-6134

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203002

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R37-AI047822, R01-AI072618, R01-DK084647, R01-CA169354, RC1-AI087257, 5 T32AI07290, T32CA09151]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs
  3. Stanford Digestive Disease Center FACS Core facility [DK56339]
  4. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  5. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ag-presenting dendritic cells (DCs) interpret environmental signals to orchestrate local and systemic immune responses. They govern the balance between tolerance and inflammation at epithelial surfaces, where the immune system must provide robust pathogen responses while maintaining tolerance to commensal flora and food Ags. The Wnt family of secreted proteins, which control epithelial and hematopoietic development and homeostasis, is emerging as an important regulator of inflammation. In this study, we show that canonical and noncanonical Wnts directly stimulate murine DC production of anti-inflammatory cytokines. Wnt3A triggers canonical beta-catenin signaling and preferentially induces DC TGF-beta and VEGF production, whereas Wnt5A induces IL-10 through alternative pathways. The Wnts also alter DC responses to microbe-or pathogen-associated molecular patterns, inhibiting proinflammatory cytokine induction in response to TLR ligands and promoting DC generation of Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells. Moreover, although both Wnts suppress proinflammatory responses to bacterial endotoxin and to TLR1/2, TLR7, and TLR9 ligands, Wnt5A, but not Wnt3A, inhibits IL-6 production in response to the viral mimic, polyinosinic: polycytidylic acid. Thus, Wnt family members directly and differentially regulate DC functions, an ability that may contribute to the balance between tolerance and inflammation at epithelial sites of exposure to microbes and environmental Ags.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据