4.6 Article

Pulmonary Expression of Oncostatin M (OSM) Promotes Inducible BALT Formation Independently of IL-6, Despite a Role for IL-6 in OSM-Driven Pulmonary Inflammation

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 191, 期 3, 页码 1453-1464

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203318

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research Grant [102562]
  2. National Institutes of Health [HL069409]
  3. Department of Medicine, University of Rochester
  4. University of Rochester [U19-AI091036]
  5. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL069409] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U19AI091036] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inducible BALT (iBALT) is associated with immune responses to respiratory infections as well as with local pathology derived from chronic inflammatory lung diseases. In this study, we assessed the role of oncostatin M (OSM) in B cell activation and iBALT formation in mouse lungs. We found that C57BL/6 mice responded to an endotracheally administered adenovirus vector expressing mouse OSM, with marked iBALT formation, increased cytokine (IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-alpha, and IL-12), and chemokine (CXCL13, CCL20, CCL21, eotaxin-2, KC, and MCP-1) production as well as inflammatory cell accumulation in the airways. B cells, T cells, and dendritic cells were also recruited to the lung, where many displayed an activated phenotype. Mice treated with control adenovirus vector (Addl70) were not affected. Interestingly, IL-6 was required for inflammatory responses in the airways and for the expression of most cytokines and chemokines. However, iBALT formation and lymphocyte recruitment to the lung tissue occurred independently of IL-6 and STAT6 as assessed in gene-deficient mice. Collectively, these results support the ability of OSM to induce B cell activation and iBALT formation independently of IL-6 and highlight a role for IL-6 downstream of OSM in the induction of pulmonary inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据