4.6 Article

IL-17A Produced by Neutrophils Protects against Pneumonic Plague through Orchestrating IFN-γ-Activated Macrophage Programming

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 192, 期 2, 页码 704-713

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301687

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation for General Programs of China [81271907, 31171407, 81273201]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [12JC1400900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Innate immune cells, including neutrophils and macrophages, are critically involved in host antimicrobial defense responses. Intrinsic regulatory mechanisms controlling neutrophil and macrophage activities are poorly defined. In this study, we found that IL-17A, a natural signal factor, could provide protection against early pneumonic plague inflammation by coordinating the functions of neutrophils and programming of macrophages. The IL-17A level is promptly increased during the initial infection. Importantly, abrogation of IL-17A or IL-17AR significantly aggravated the infection, but mIL-17A treatment could significantly alleviate inflammatory injury, revealing that IL-17A is a critical requirement for early protection of infection. We also demonstrated that IL-17A was predominantly produced by CD11b(+)Ly6G(+) neutrophils. Although IL-17A could not significantly affect the antimicrobial responses of neutrophils, it could target the proinflammatory macrophage (M1) programming and potentiate the M1's defense against pneumonic plague. Mechanistically, IFN-gamma treatment or IFN-gamma-activated M1 macrophage transfer could significantly mitigate the aggravated infection of IL-17A(-/-) mice. Finally, we showed that IL-17A and IFN-gamma could synergistically promote macrophage anti-infection immunity. Thus, our findings identify a previously unrecognized function of IL-17A as an intrinsic regulator in coordinating neutrophil and macrophage antimicrobial activity to provide protection against acute pneumonic plague.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据