4.6 Article

Recognition and Prevention of Tumor Metastasis by the NK Receptor NKp46/NCR1

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 188, 期 6, 页码 2509-2515

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102461

关键词

-

资金

  1. Israeli Science Foundation
  2. Israeli Science Foundation (Morasha)
  3. Croatia-Israel research grant
  4. Israel Cancer Research Fund
  5. Israeli Ministry of Science and Technology-German Cancer Research Center
  6. Rosetrees Trust
  7. Israel Cancer Association [20100003]
  8. Katten Foundation
  9. Association for International Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NK cells employ a variety of activating receptors to kill virally infected and tumor cells. Prominent among these receptors are the natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs) (NKp30, NKp44, and NKp46), of which only NKp46 has a mouse ortholog (NCR1). The tumor ligand(s) of NKp46/NCR1 is still unknown, but it was shown that the human NKp46 and the mouse NCR1 are involved in tumor eradication both in vitro and in vivo. Whether any of the NK activating receptors is involved in the prevention of tumor metastasis is unknown. To address this question, we studied the activity of the NK cell receptor NKp46/NCR1 in two spontaneous metastasis models, the B16F10.9 melanoma (B16) and the Lewis lung carcinoma (D122) in the NCR1 knockout mouse that was generated by our group, in various in vitro and in vivo assays. We demonstrated that all B16 and D122 tumors, including those generated in vivo, express an unknown ligand(s) for NKp46/NCR1. We have characterized the properties of the NKp46/NCR1 ligand(s) and demonstrated that NKp46/NCR1 is directly involved in the killing of B16 and D122 cells. Importantly, we showed in vivo that NKp46/NCR1 plays an important role in controlling B16 and D122 metastasis. Thus, to our knowledge, in this study we provide the first evidence for the direct involvement of a specific NK killer receptor in preventing tumor metastasis. The Journal of Immunology, 2012, 188: 2509-2515.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据