4.6 Article

Crosstalk between Human IgG Isotypes and Murine Effector Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 189, 期 7, 页码 3430-3438

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200356

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of human therapeutic Abs has led to reduced immunogenicity and optimal interactions with the human immune system in patients. Humanization had as a consequence that efficacy studies performed in mouse models, which represent a crucial step in preclinical development, are more difficult to interpret because of gaps in our knowledge of the activation of murine effector cells by human IgG (hIgG) remain. We therefore developed full sets of human and mouse isotype variants of human Abs targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and CD20 to explore the crosstalk with mouse Fc gamma Rs (mFc gamma Rs) and murine effector cells. Analysis of mFc gamma R binding demonstrated that hIgG1 and hIgG3 bound to all four mFc gamma Rs, with hIgG3 having the highest affinity. hIgG1 nevertheless was more potent than hIgG3 in inducing Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and Ab-dependent cellular phagocytosis with mouse NK cells, mouse polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and mouse macrophages. hIgG4 bound to all mFc gamma Rs except mFc gamma RIV and showed comparable interactions with murine effector cells to hIgG3. hIgG4 is thus active in the murine immune system, in contrast with its inert phenotype in the human system. hIgG2 bound to mFc gamma RIIb and mFc gamma RIII, and induced potent ADCC with mouse NK cells and mouse polymorphonuclear leukocytes. hIgG2 induced weak ADCC and, remarkably, was unable to induce Ab-dependent cellular phagocytosis with mouse macrophages. Finally, the isotypes were studied in s.c. and i.v. tumor xenograft models, which confirmed hIgG1 to be the most potent human isotype in mouse models. These data enhance our understanding of the crosstalk between hIgGs and murine effector cells, permitting a better interpretation of human Ab efficacy studies in mouse models. The Journal of Immunology, 2012, 189: 3430-3438.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据