4.6 Article

Cytosolic DNA-Activated Human Dendritic Cells Are Potent Activators of the Adaptive Immune Response

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 187, 期 3, 页码 1222-1234

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100469

关键词

-

资金

  1. Rheuminations and National Institutes of Health [RO1 AI 49954, RO1 AI 68787]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies in cell lines and genetically engineered mice have demonstrated that cytosolic dsDNA could activate dendritic cells (DCs) to become effector APCs. Recognition of DNA might be a major factor in antimicrobial immune responses against cytosolic pathogens and also in human autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus. However, the role of cytosolic dsDNA in human DC activation and its effects on effector T and B cells are still elusive. In this study, we demonstrate that intracellular dsDNA is a potent activator of human monocyte-derived DCs as well as primary DCs. Activation by dsDNA depends on NF-kappa B activation, partially on the adaptor molecule IFN-promoter stimulator-1 and the novel cytosolic dsDNA receptor IFI16, but not on the previously recognized dsDNA sentinels absent in melanoma 2, DNA-dependent activator of IFN regulatory factor 3, RNA polymerase III, or high-mobility group boxes. More importantly, we report for the first time, to our knowledge, that human dsDNA-activated DCs, rather than LPS-or inflammatory cytokine mixture-activated DCs, represent the most potent inducers of naive CD4(+) T cells to promote Th1-type cytokine production and generate CD4(+) and CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells. dsDNA-DCs, but not LPS- or mixture-activated DCs, induce B cells to produce complement-fixing IgG1 and IgG3 Abs. We propose that cytosolic dsDNA represents a novel, more effective approach to generate DCs to enhance vaccine effectiveness in reprogramming the adaptive immune system to eradicate infectious agents, autoimmunity, allergy, and cancer. The Journal of Immunology, 2011, 187: 1222-1234.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据