4.6 Article

Regulation of Macrophage Arginase Expression and Tumor Growth by the Ron Receptor Tyrosine Kinase

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 187, 期 5, 页码 2181-2192

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003460

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Heart Association [09GRNT2390164]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM57384]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

M1 activation of macrophages promotes inflammation and immunity to intracellular pathogens, whereas M2 macrophage activation promotes resolution of inflammation, wound healing, and tumor growth. These divergent phenotypes are characterized, in part, by the expression of inducible NO synthase and arginase I (Arg1) in M1 versus M2 activated macrophages, respectively. In this study, we demonstrate that the Ron receptor tyrosine kinase tips the balance of macrophage activation by attenuating the M1 phenotype while promoting expression of Arg1 through a Stat6-independent mechanism. Induction of the Arg1 promoter by Ron is mediated by an AP-1 site located 433 bp upstream of the transcription start site. Treatment of primary macrophages with macrophage stimulating protein, the ligand for Ron, induces potent MAPK activation, upregulates Fos, and enhances binding of Fos to the AP-1 site in the Arg1 promoter. In vivo, Arg1 expression in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) from Ron(-/-) mice was significantly reduced compared with that in TAMs from control animals. Furthermore, we show that Ron is expressed specifically by Tie2-expressing macrophages, a TAM subset that exhibits a markedly skewed M2 and protumoral phenotype. Decreased Arg1 in TAMs from Ron(-/-) mice was associated with reduced syngeneic tumor growth in these animals. These findings indicate that Ron induces Arg1 expression in macrophages through a previously uncharacterized AP-1 site in the Arg1 promoter and that Ron could be therapeutically targeted in the tumor microenvironment to inhibit tumor growth by targeting expression of Arg1. The Journal of Immunology, 2011, 187: 2181-2192.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据