4.6 Article

Limiting CDR-H3 Diversity Abrogates the Antibody Response to the Bacterial Polysaccharide α 1 → 3 Dextran

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 187, 期 2, 页码 879-886

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100957

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI045794-33, AI48115, AI088498, AI090742, AI090902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anti-polysaccharide Ab responses in mice are often oligoclonal, and the mechanisms involved in Ag-specific clone production and selection remain poorly understood. We evaluated the relative contribution of D(H) germline content versus N nucleotide addition in a classic oligoclonal, T-independent Ab response (alpha 1 -> 3 dextran [DEX]) by challenging adult TdT-sufficient (TdT(+/+)) and TdT-deficient (TdT(-/-)) gene-targeted mice, limited to the use of a single D(H) gene segment (D-limited mice), with Enterobacter cloacae. D-limited mice achieved anti-DEX-specific levels of Abs that were broadly comparable to those of wild-type (WT) BALB/c mice. Sequence analysis of the third CDR of the H chain intervals obtained by PCR amplification of V(H) domain DNA from DEX-specific plasmablasts revealed the near universal presence of an aspartic acid residue (D99) at the V-D junction, irrespective of the composition of the D(H) locus. Although WT mice were able to use germline D(H) (DQ52, DSP, or DST) gene segment sequence, TdT activity, or both to produce D99, all three D-limited mouse strains relied exclusively on N addition. Additionally, in the absence of TdT, D-limited mice failed to produce a DEX response. Coupled with previous studies demonstrating a reduced response to DEX in TdT(-/-) mice with a WT D(H) locus, we concluded that in the case of the anti-DEX repertoire, which uses a short third CDR of the H chain, the anti-DEX response relies more intensely on sequences created by postnatal N nucleotide addition than on the germline sequence of the D(H). The Journal of Immunology, 2011, 187: 879-886.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据