4.6 Article

The Transport and Inactivation Kinetics of Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide Influence Its Immunological Potency In Vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 187, 期 6, 页码 3314-3320

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1004087

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI18188]
  2. Jan and Henri Bromberg Chair in Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School (Dallas, TX)
  3. Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extraordinary potency and pathological relevance of Gram-negative bacterial LPSs have made them very popular experimental agonists, yet little is known about what happens to these stimulatory molecules within animal tissues. We tracked fluorescent and radiolabeled LPS from a s.c. inoculation site to its draining lymph nodes (DLN), blood, and liver. Although we found FITC-labeled LPS in DLN within minutes of injection, drainage of radiolabeled LPS continued for >6 wk. Within the DLN, most of the LPS was found in the subcapsular sinus or medulla, near or within lymphatic endothelial cells and CD169(+) macrophages. Whereas most of the LPS seemed to pass through the DLN without entering B cell follicles, by 24 h after injection a small amount of LPS was found in the paracortex. In wild-type mice, >= 70% of the injected radiolabeled LPS underwent inactivation by deacylation before it left the footpad; in animals that lacked acyloxyacyl hydrolase, the LPS-deacylating enzyme, prolonged drainage of fully acylated (active) LPS boosted polyclonal IgM and IgG3 Ab titers. LPS egress from a s.c. injection site thus occurred during many weeks and was mainly via lymphatic channels. Its immunological potency, as measured by its ability to stimulate polyclonal Ab production, was greatly influenced by the kinetics of both lymphatic drainage and enzymatic inactivation. The Journal of Immunology, 2011, 187: 3314-3320.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据