4.6 Article

IL-17A-Producing γδT Cells Promote CTL Responses against Listeria monocytogenes Infection by Enhancing Dendritic Cell Cross-Presentation

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 185, 期 10, 页码 5879-5887

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001763

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30721091]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2007CB512403, 2009CB521902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interleukin-17A-producing T cells, especially Th17, have been shown to be involved in inflammatory autoimmune diseases and host defense against extracellular infections. However, whether and how IL-17A or IL-17A-producing cells can help protection against intracellular bacteria remains controversial, especially how it regulates the adaptive immunity besides recruitment of neutrophils in the innate immune system. By infecting IL-17A-deficient mice with Listeria monocytogenes, we show in this study that IL-17A is required for the generation of Ag-specific CD8(+) CTL response against primary infection, but not for the generation of memory CD8(+) T cells against secondary challenge. Interestingly, we identify gamma delta T cells, but not conventional CD4(+) Th17 cells, as the main cells for innate IL-17A production during L. monocytogenes infection. Furthermore, gamma delta T cells are found to promote Ag-specific CD8(+) T cell proliferation by enhancing cross-presentation of dendritic cells through IL-17A. Adoptive transfer of Il17a(+/+) gamma delta T cells, but not Il17a(-/-) gamma delta T cells or Il17a(+/+) CD4(+) T cells, were sufficient to recover dendritic cells cross-presentation and defective CD8(+) T cell response in Il17a(-/-) mice. Our findings indicate an important role of infection-inducible IL-17A-producing gamma delta T cells and their derived IL-17A against intracellular bacterial infection, providing a mechanism of IL-17A for regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 185: 5879-5887.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据