4.6 Article

Retinoic Acid Determines the Precise Tissue Tropism of Inflammatory Th17 Cells in the Intestine

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 184, 期 10, 页码 5519-5526

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903942

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01AI074745, 1R56A1080769, 1R01DK076616]
  2. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Th17 cells are major effector T cells in the intestine, but the regulation of their tissue tropism within the gut is poorly understood. We investigated the roles of vitamin A and retinoic acid in generation of inflammatory Th17 cells with distinct tissue tropisms within the intestine. We found that Th17 cells with distinct tissue tropisms and pathogenic activities are generated depending on the available concentration of retinoic acid (RA). In contrast to the widespread perception that RA would suppress the generation of Th17 cells, we provide evidence that RA is actually required for generation of Th17 cells with specific tissue tropisms within the gut. Th17 cells induced at suboptimal serum concentrations of RA migrated and induced moderate inflammation mainly in the large intestine, whereas the Th17 cells induced with optimal levels of exogenous RA (similar to 10 nM) migrated to the small intestine and induced more severe inflammation. The Th17 cells, induced in the presence or absence of RA, differentially expressed the trafficking receptors CCR9 and alpha 4 beta 7. CCR9 is required for Th17 cell migration to the small intestine, whereas alpha 4 beta 7 is required for the migration of Th17 cells throughout the whole intestine. Our results identified RA as a major signal that regulates the generation of gut Th17 cells with distinct capacities in migration and inflammatory activities. The results indicate also that specific gut tropism of Th17 cells is determined by the combination of trafficking receptors regulated by the RA signal. The Journal of Immunology, 2010,184: 5519-5526.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据