4.6 Article

Antigen-Specific Th9 Cells Exhibit Uniqueness in Their Kinetics of Cytokine Production and Short Retention at the Inflammatory Site

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 185, 期 11, 页码 6795-6801

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001676

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently reported lines of Th9 cells, producing IL-9 and IL-10, were generated by polarization with IL-4 and TGF-beta and activation with Abs against CD3 and CD28. In this paper, we analyzed features of Th9 lines similarly polarized but activated by the natural mode (i.e., exposure of CD4 cells to their target Ag, hen egg lysozyme [HEL] and APCs). Main observations are the following: 1) both IL-9 and IL-10 were expressed by the line cells, but with strikingly different kinetics, with IL-9 being produced rapidly, reaching a peak on day 3 in culture and declining sharply thereafter, whereas IL-10 production increased gradually, resembling IL-4 and IL-17 production by their corresponding lineage cells; 2) reactivation of Th9, following expansion, triggered faster and higher production of both IL-9 and IL-10; 3) incubating Th9 cells in polarizing media specific for other phenotypes stimulated moderate levels of phenotype switching to Th1 or Th17 but a massive switching to Th2; 4) Th9 cells induced moderate inflammation in HEL-expressing recipient eyes but only when producing high levels of IL-9; and 5) IL-9-producing donor cells were detected in the blood of Th9 recipients but not in their inflamed eyes, suggesting that similar to findings in culture, exposure to HEL in these eyes arrested the IL-9 production in Th9 cells. Collectively, these data provide new information concerning Th9 cells and reveal their uniqueness, in particular with regard to the unusual production kinetics of IL-9 and the short retention of these cells in affected target tissues. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 185: 6795-6801.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据