4.6 Article

Langerhans Cells Prime IL-17-Producing T Cells and Dampen Genital Cytotoxic Responses following Mucosal Immunization

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 184, 期 9, 页码 4842-4851

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901695

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicate
  2. Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le syndrome d'immunodeficience acquise (SIDA)
  3. Association Ensemble contre le SIDA (SIDACTION)
  4. Association de Recherche sur le Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Langerhans cells (LCs) are dendritic cells (DCs) localized in stratified epithelia, such as those overlaying skin, buccal mucosa, and vagina. The contribution of LCs to the promotion or control of immunity initiated at epithelial sites remains debated. We report in this paper that an immunogen comprising OVA linked to the B subunit of cholera toxin, used as delivery vector, was efficient to generate CTLs after vaginal immunization. Using Lang-EGFP mice, we evaluated the contribution of distinct DC subsets to the generation of CD4 and CD8 T cell responses. We demonstrate that the vaginal epithelium, unlike the skin epidermis, includes a minor population of LCs and a major subset of langerin(-) DCs. Intravaginally administered Ag is taken up by LCs and langerin(-) DCs and carried up to draining lymph nodes, where both subsets prime CD8 T cells, unlike blood-derived DCs, although with distinct capabilities. LCs prime CD8 T cells with a cytokine profile dominated by IL-17, whereas Lang(-) DCs induce IFN-gamma-producing T cells. Using Lang-DTR-EGFP mice to ensure a transient ablation of LCs, we found that these cells not only are dispensable for the generation of genital CTL responses but also downregulate these responses, by a mechanism that may involve IL-10 and IL-17 cytokines. This finding has implications for the development of mucosal vaccines and immunotherapeutic strategies designed for the targeting of DCs. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 184: 4842-4851.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据