4.6 Article

Functional Analysis of Lyn Kinase A and B Isoforms Reveals Redundant and Distinct Roles in Fc epsilon RI-Dependent Mast Cell Activation

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 184, 期 9, 页码 5000-5008

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0904064

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [ZIAAR041101, ZICAR041186] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engagement of Fc epsilon RI causes its phosphorylation by Lyn kinase. Two alternatively spliced variants, Lyn A and B, are expressed in mast cells, and both isoforms interact with Fc epsilon RI. Unlike Lyn A, Lyn B lacks a 21-aa region in the N-terminal unique domain. In this study, we investigated the role of Lyn A and B isoforms in mast cell signaling and responses. Lyn B was found to be a poor inducer of mast cell degranulation and was less potent in both inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate production and calcium responses. Expression of Lyn B alone showed reduced phosphorylation of both phospholipase C gamma-1 and -2 and decreased interaction of phospholipase C gamma-1 with the phosphorylated linker for activation of T cells. Lyn B also showed increased binding of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins, which included the negative regulatory lipid phosphatase SHIP-1. In contrast, both Lyn A and B caused similar total cellular tyrosine phosphorylation and Fc epsilon RI phosphorylation and neither Lyn A nor Lyn B alone could completely restore mast cell degranulation or dampen the excessive cytokine production seen in the absence of Lyn. However, expression of both isoforms showed complementation and normalized responses. These findings demonstrate that Lyn B differs from Lyn A in its association with SHIP-1 and in the regulation of calcium responses. However, complementation of both isoforms is required in mast cell activation. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 184: 5000-5008.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据