4.6 Article

Loss of CD4+ T Cell IL-6R Expression during Inflammation Underlines a Role for IL-6 Trans Signaling in the Local Maintenance of Th17 Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 184, 期 4, 页码 2130-2139

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901528

关键词

-

资金

  1. Arthritis Research Campaign
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Versus Arthritis [18286] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IL-6 responses are classically orchestrated via a membrane-bound IL-6R (CD126) alpha subunit (classical IL-6R signaling) or through a soluble form of this cognate receptor (IL-6 trans signaling). Appraisal of IL-6R expression on human and mouse T cells emphasized that IL-6R expression is closely linked with that of CCR7 and CD62L. In this regard, infiltrating effector T cells from clinical and experimental peritonitis episodes lose TL-6R expression, and anti-CD3/CD28 Ab costimulation of peripheral T cells in vitro leads to a downregulation in IL-6R expression. Consequently, IL-6 signaling through membrane-bound IL-6R seems to be limited to naive or central memory T cell populations. Loss of IL-6R expression by activated T cells further suggests that these effector cells might still retain IL-6 responsiveness via IL-6 trans signaling. Using IL-6R-deficient mice and recombinant tools that modulate the capacity of IL-6 to signal via its soluble receptor, we report that local control of IL-6 trans signaling regulates the effector characteristics of the T cell infiltrate and promotes the maintenance of IL-17A-secreting CD4(+) T cells. Therefore, we concluded that classical IL-6R signaling in naive or central memory CD4(+) T cells is required to steer their effector characteristics, whereas local regulation of soluble IL-6R activity might serve to maintain the cytokine profile of the Th cell infiltrate. Therefore, the activation status of a T cell population is linked with an alteration in IL-6 responsiveness. The Journal of Immunology, 2010,184: 2130-2139.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据