4.6 Article

Substrain Differences Reveal Novel Disease-Modifying Gene Candidates That Alter the Clinical Course of a Rodent Model of Multiple Sclerosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 184, 期 6, 页码 3174-3185

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902881

关键词

-

资金

  1. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Doctoral Research Award: Canada Graduate Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is a rodent model of multiple sclerosis that is executed in animals by immunization with myelin Ag in adjuvant. The SJL/J autoimmune-prone strain of mouse has been used to model relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. However, significant variations in peak scores, timing of onset, and incidence are observed among laboratories, with the postacute (relapse) phase of the disease exhibiting significant inconsistency. We characterized two substrains of SJL/J mice that exhibit profoundly different EAE disease parameters. Induction of EAE in the first SJL/J substrain resulted in many cases of chronic EAE that was dominated by an aggressive B cell response to the immunizing Ag and to endogenous CNS Ags. In contrast, the other SJL/J substrain exhibited a relapsing-remitting form of EAE concomitant with an elevated number of cytokine-producing CD4(+) T cells in the CNS. Exploiting these interstrain differences, we performed a genome-wide copy number analysis on the two disparate SJL/J substrains and discovered numerous gene-dosage differences. In particular, one inflammation-associated gene, Naip1, was present at a higher copy number in the SJL/J substrain that exhibited relapsing-remitting EAE. These results demonstrate that substrain differences, perhaps at the level of genomic copy number, can account for variability in the postacute phase of EAE and may drive chronic versus relapsing disease. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 184: 3174-3185.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据