4.6 Article

HSP90α and HSP90β Isoforms Selectively Modulate MHC Class II Antigen Presentation in B Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 182, 期 12, 页码 7451-7458

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804296

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI49589]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two isoforms of heat shock protein (HSP) 90, alpha and beta, are abundantly expressed in the cytoplasm of cells, yet only HSP90 alpha serves as a chaperone to potentiate epitope presentation in the context of MHC class I molecules. By contrast, the role of HSP90 isoforms in MHC class II presentation of exogenous and endogenous Ags remains less clear. Studies here using human B lymphoblasts demonstrate the importance of HSP90 alpha and HSP90 beta isoforms in selectively regulating class II presentation of the diabetes autoantigen glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD). Inactivation of HSP90 function using geldanamycin or radicicol inhibited MHC class II presentation of exogenous and endogenous GAD, but did not perturb the presentation of several other intra- and extracellular Ags. Treatment of human B cells with geldanamycin and radicicol did not alter cellular MHC class II expression, but did induce a stress response in these APCs. Yet, cell stress alone failed to perturb MHC class II presentation of GAD. HSP90 was found to associate with select Ags such as GAD in cells and ex vivo. Knockdown of HSP90a or HSP90 beta expression using small interfering RNA decreased the abundance of each isoform, respectively, but did not affect MHC class II expression or induce a stress response. Notably, disruption of HSP90 alpha or HSP90 beta expression specifically inhibited class II presentation of the exogenous and endogenous GAD Ag. Precomplexing HSP90 with GAD Ag enhanced exogenous GAD Ag presentation. These results demonstrate a requirement for HSP90a and HSP90 beta in regulating class II presentation of select Ags. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 7451-7458.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据