4.6 Article

Scabies Mite Inactivated Serine Protease Paralogs Inhibit the Human Complement System

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 182, 期 12, 页码 7809-7817

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804205

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian National Health [496600]
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  5. University Hospitals in Malmo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infestation of skin by the parasitic itch mite Sarcoples scabiei afflicts 300 million people worldwide and there is a need for novel and efficient therapies. We have previously identified a multigene family of serine proteases comprising multiple catalytically inactive members (scabies mite-inactivated protease paralogs (SMIPPs)), which are secreted into the gut of S. scabiei. SMIPPs are located in the mite gut, and in feces excreted into the upper epidermis. Scabies mites feed on epidermal protein, including host plasma; consequently, they are exposed to host defense mechanisms both internally and externally. We found that two recombinantly expressed SMIPPs inhibited all three pathways of the human complement system. Both SMIPPs exerted their inhibitory action due to binding of three molecules involved in the three different mechanisms which initiate complement: C1q, mannose-binding lectin, and properdin. Both SMIPPs bound to the stalk domains of C1q, possibly displacing or inhibiting C1r/C1s, which are associated with the same domain. Furthermore, we found that binding of both SMIPPs to properdin resulted in prevention of assembly of the alternative pathway convertases. However, the SMIPPs were not able to dissociate already formed convertases. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated the presence of C1q in the gut of scabies mites in skin burrows. We propose that SMIPPs minimize complement-mediated gut damage and thus create a favorable environment for the scabies mites. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 7809-7817.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据