4.6 Article

Differential Expression of Granzyme B and C in Murine Cytotoxic Lymphocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 182, 期 10, 页码 6287-6297

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804333

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK49786, A1059083, P30 AR048335]
  2. Department of Pathology and Immunology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytotoxic lymphocytes use the granule exocytosis pathway to kill pathogen-infected cells and tumor cells. Although many genes in this pathway have been extensively characterized (e.g., perforin, granzymes A and B), the role of granzyme C is less clear. We therefore developed a granzyme C-specific mAb and used flow cytometry to examine the expression of granzyme B and C in the lymphocyte compartments of wild-type and mutant GzmB(-/-) ere mice, which have a small deletion in the granzyme B gene. We detected granzyme B and C expression in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells activated with CD3/CD28 beads or MLRs. Stimulation of NK cells in vitro with IL-15 also induced expression of both granzymes. Granzyme C up-regulation was delayed relative to granzyme B in wild-type lymphocytes, whereas GzmB(-/-) ere cells expressed granzyme C earlier and more abundantly on a per-cell basis, suggesting that the deleted 350-bp region in the granzyme B gene is important for the regulation of both granzymes B and C. Quantitative RT-PCR revealed that granzyme C protein levels were regulated by mRNA abundance. In vivo, a population of wild-type CD8 alpha alpha(+) intraepithelial lymphocytes constitutively expressed granzyme B and GzmB(-/-) ere intraepithelial lymphocytes likewise expressed granzyme C. Using a model of a persistent murine CMV infection, we detected delayed expression of granzyme C in NK cells from infected hosts. Taken together, these findings suggest that granzyme C is activated with persistent antigenic stimulation, providing nonredundant backup protection for the host when granzyme B fails. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 6287-6297.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据