4.6 Article

TSLP Conditions the Lung Immune Environment for the Generation of Pathogenic Innate and Antigen-Specific Adaptive Immune Responses

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 182, 期 3, 页码 1641-1647

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.3.1641

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI44259, AI68731, AI71130]
  2. Department of Defense [USAMRAA W81XWH-07-0246]
  3. National Cancer Institute [CA009537]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is crucial for the development of atopic diseases in humans and mice. Mice that express a lung-specific TSLP transgene (surfactant protein C promoter (SPC)-TSLP) develop a spontaneous and progressive asthma-like disease, suggesting that TSLP expression alone was sufficient for disease development. In this study, we show that, ill fact, TSLP alone only causes a weak innate response that is insufficient for development of full airway inflammatory disease. Complete disease development requires both TSLP and antigenic stimulation. These data suggest that the spontaneous lung inflammation observed in SPC-TSLP mice reflects a TSLP-driven predisposition toward the development of aberrant responses against innocuous environmental Ags. This provides evidence that TSLP may act directly to induce susceptibility to the inappropriate allergic responses that characterize atopy and asthma. We additionally show that disease development requires CD4 T cells but not B cells. Further, we reveal a TSLP-driven innate response involving mucus overproduction and goblet cell metaplasia. Taken together, these data suggest a multifaceted model of TSLP-mediated airway inflammation, with an initial activation of resident innate immune cells, followed by activation of the adaptive immune system and full disease development. This study provides new insight into the unique features of the asthma pathology contributed by the innate and adaptive immune responses in response to TSLP stimulation. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 1641-1647.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据