4.6 Article

Regulatory T Cells: A Role in the Control of Helminth-Driven Intestinal Pathology and Worm Survival

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 182, 期 4, 页码 2340-2348

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802767

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. Wellcome Trust [081120]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chronic nature of intestinal nematode infections suggests that these parasites have evolved sophisticated immunomodulatory strategies. The induction of regulatory responses during chronic helminth infections could be advantageous to the host by minimizing damage incurred by these organisms. Regulation of the host immune response to infection could however be exploited by parasites as a survival strategy. We have explored both these aspects using the murine model of whipworm infection, Trichuris muris. Of the three laboratory isolates of T. muris in use, two (the E (Edinburgh) and J (Japan, subcultured from E)) are readily expelled by C57BL/6 mice, whereas the third, the S isolate (Sobreda, isolated from wild mice in Portugal) survives for much longer. The existence of the T. muris isolates thus presents a powerful tool to explore the mechanisms underlying chronic infection in a single strain of mouse. In this study, we show that S isolate-infected mice have increased numbers of Foxp3(+) T cells in the gut compared with mice infected with the E isolate. Treatment of mice infected with the S isolate with either anti-CD25 or anti-glucocorticoid-induced TNFR exacerbated intestinal pathology, and, in addition, mice treated with anti-glucocorticoid-induced TNFR were able to expel worms more rapidly, implying the release of local effector mechanisms from a regulatory influence. Thus, our data show for the first time that T regulatory cells protect the host from worm-driven intestinal pathology. In addition, our data reveal a subversion of this damage-limiting response by the S isolate to facilitate its own survival. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 2340-2348.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据