4.6 Article

Characterization of Preexisting MAGE-A3-Specific CD4+ T Cells in Cancer Patients and Healthy Individuals and Their Activation by Protein Vaccination

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 183, 期 7, 页码 4800-4808

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900903

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Vaccine Collaborative
  2. Cancer Research Institute
  3. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vaccination with cancer/testis Ag MAGE-A3 in the form of recombinant protein often induces specific humoral and cellular immune responses. Although Ag-specific CD4(+) T cells following vaccination are detectable by cytokine production after a single in vitro stimulation, their detection before vaccination is difficult because of low frequency. In this study, we have applied a sensitive method using CD154 (CD40L) staining to detect NIAGE-A3-specific CD4(+) T cells. MAGE-A3-specific T cell responses were analyzed in four healthy donors, two lung cancer patients with spontaneous serum Abs to MAGE-A3, and two baseline seronegative lung cancer patients throughout vaccination with MAGE-A3 protein. NIAGE-A3-specific CD4(+) T cells were detected in all individuals tested, at low frequency in healthy donors and seronegative cancer patients and higher frequency in patients seropositive for MAGE-A3. Polyclonal expansion of CD154-expressing CD4(+) T cells after cell sorting generated a large number of MAGE-A3-specific CD4(+) T cell lines from all individuals tested, enabling full characterization of peptide specificity, HLA-restriction, and avidity. Application of this method to cancer patients vaccinated with MAGE-A3 protein with or without adjuvant revealed that protein vaccination induced oligoclonal activation of MAGE-A3-specific CD4(+) T cells. It appeared that MAGE-A3 protein vaccination in the presence of adjuvant selectively expanded high avidity CD4(+) T cells, whereas high avidity T cells disappeared after multiple vaccinations with MAGE-A3 protein alone. The Journal of Immunology, 2009,183: 4800-4808.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据