4.6 Article

Perturbation of the CD4 T Cell Compartment and Expansion of Regulatory T Cells in Autoimmune-Prone Lyn-Deficient Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 183, 期 4, 页码 2484-2494

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804346

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.
  2. Australian government.
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a subset of T lymphocytes that are responsible for suppressing the function of other immune cells, and preventing potentially harmful autoimmune responses. Studies in autoimmune-prone mice and human autoimmune diseases have shown reduced Treg number or function as a causative factor for the apparent loss of tolerance that contributes to disease. We have found that Lyn-deficient mice, which develop high titers of autoantibodies with age, have a perturbed Treg compartment. Contrary to what has been observed in some strains of autoimmune-prone mice, aged Lyn-deficient mice have increased numbers of Tregs. This expansion occurs in the presence of elevated serum IL-2 and diminished TGF-beta. Despite expansion of the Treg compartment, Lyn-deficient mice succumb at similar to 1 year of age due to immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis. We have shown that Lyn is not expressed in Tregs or indeed in any T cell subset, suggesting that the expansion and apparent functional deficiency in Tregs in Lyn-deficient mice is due to extrinsic factors rather than an intrinsic Treg defect. Indeed, using an in vivo colitis model, we have shown that Lyn-deficient Tregs can suppress inflammation. These results suggest that Tregs are expanding in Lyn-deficient mice in an effort to control the autoimmune disease but are simply overwhelmed by the disease process. This study highlights the role of the inflammatory setting in autoimmune disease and its consideration when contemplating the use of Tregs as an autoimmune therapy. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 183: 2484-2494.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据