4.6 Article

CD4(+)CD25(+) Regulatory T Cells Resist a Novel Form of CD28-and Fas-Dependent p53-Induced T Cell Apoptosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 184, 期 1, 页码 94-104

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900753

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AI055022, R21AG030953]
  2. Medical College of Georgia Intramural Scientist Training Program
  3. Arthritis Foundation
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI055022] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R21AG030953] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM [R03AA018583] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ag receptor stimulation of preactivated T cells causes rapid cell death in an IL-2- and Fas-dependent manner. This phenomenon, known as activation-induced cell death (AICD), plays a pivotal role in the removal of Ag-reactive T cells after initial expansion. In this study, we report a novel form of T cell apoptosis that is distinct from classic AICD. When peripheral T cells were activated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 Abs precoated onto plastic plates, CD4(+)CD25(-) and CD8 T cells initially expanded but underwent massive apoptosis after 4 d. Unlike classic AICD, this type of T cell apoptosis pathway requires engagement of CD28 and expression of p53, a tumor-suppressor gene. The most striking feature of this form of apoptosis was regulatory T cell resistance. Under the same stimulating conditions, CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells grew continuously beyond 4 d. Consequently, when the entire CD4 population was cultured with plate-bound anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 Ab, CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells outgrew non-regulatory T cells and expanded > 7000-fold after 11 d. The data presented herein demonstrate a novel process of Ag-induced T cell death by sustained TCR and CD28 engagement and represent a simple and efficient procedure for the expansion of regulatory T cells in vitro. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 184: 94-104.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据