4.6 Article

Heat Shock Protein 96 Is Elevated in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Activates Macrophages Primarily via TLR2 Signaling

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 182, 期 8, 页码 4965-4973

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801563

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AR055240, AR048269, CA104392]
  2. American College of Rheumatology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrophages are important mediators of chronic inflammation and are prominent in the synovial lining and sublining of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recently, we demonstrated increased TLR2 and TILR4 expression and increased response to microbial TLR2 and TLR4 ligands in macrophages from the joints of RA. The current study characterized the expression of the 96-kDa heat shock glycoprotein (gp96) in the joints of RA and its role as an endogenous TLR ligand to promote innate immunity in RA. gp96 was increased in RA compared with osteoarthritis and arthritis-free control synovial tissues. The expression of gp96 strongly correlated with inflammation and synovial lining thickness. gp96 was increased in synovial fluid from the joints of RA compared with disease controls. Recombinant gp96 was a potent activator of macrophages and the activation was mediated primarily through TLR2 signaling. The cellular response to gp96 was significantly stronger with RA synovial macrophages compared with peripheral blood monocytes from RA or healthy controls. The transcription of TLR2, TNF-alpha, and IL-8, but not TLR4, was significantly induced by gp96, and the induction was significantly greater in purified RA synovial macrophages. The expression of TLR2, but not TLR4, on synovial fluid macrophages strongly correlated with the level of gp96 in the synovial fluid. The present study documents the potential role of gp96 as an endogenous TLR2 ligand in, RA and provides insight into the mechanism by which gp96 promotes the chronic inflammation of RA, identifying gp96 as a potential new therapeutic target. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 4965-4973.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据