4.6 Article

Targeting CpG oligonucleotides to the lymph node by nanoparticles elicits efficient antitumoral immunity

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 181, 期 5, 页码 2990-2998

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.5.2990

关键词

-

资金

  1. Else-Kroner Fresenius Foundation
  2. Deutsche Krebshilfe [10-2214-En3]
  3. German Research Foundation [En 169/7-2]
  4. Graduiertenkolleg [1202]
  5. LMU excellent [CiPSM 114]
  6. [SFB-TR 36]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Viral nucleic acids are recognized by specific pattern-recognition receptors of the Toll-like and RIG-I-like receptor families. Synthetic DNA and RNA oligonucleotides can activate the immune system through these receptors and potentiate Ab and CD8 cytotoxic responses to Ags. Systemic application of immunostimulatory oligonucleotides however also results in a generalized, non-Ag-specific stimulation of the immune system. In this study, we have dissociated the induction of an Ag-specific response from the systemic immune activation generally associated with immunostimulatory oligonucleotides. Delivery of CpG oligodeoxynucleotidesr that bind TLR9 by cationized gelatin-based nanoparticles potentiates the in vivo generation of an Ag-specific cytotoxic T cell and Ab response. Furthermore, immunization with CpG-loaded nanoparticles induces a protective antitumoral response in a murine model of melanoma. The systemic release of proinflammatory cytokines and widespread immunostimulation associated with free CpG is however completely abolished. In addition, we show that gelatin nanoparticle formulation prevents the destruction of lymphoid follicles mediated by CpG. Nanoparticle-delivered CpG, in contrast to free CpG, are selectively targeted to APCs in the lymph nodes where they mediate local immune stimulation. We describe a novel strategy to target immunostimulatory oligonucleotides to the initiation site of the immune response while at the same time protecting from an indiscriminate and generalized activation of the immune system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据