4.6 Article

Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Expression of NAD(P)H:Quinone Oxidoreductase 1 and Heme Oxygenase-1 Protects against Excessive Inflammatory Responses in Human Monocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 181, 期 10, 页码 6730-6737

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.10.6730

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [U.1059.00.011(60399), MC_U105960399] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U105960399] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_U105960399] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monocytes play a central role in the immunopathological effects of sepsis. This role is mediated by production of the cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta. The transcription factor NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) regulates innate immune responses in various experimental disease models. Presently, the role of Nrf2-regulated genes in LPS-treated human monocytes is not well defined. Herein we show that Nrf2 mediates a significant regulation of LPS-induced inflammatory responses. Analysis of Nrf2-regulated gene expression in human monocytes showed that LPS induced the expression of the phase II detoxification gene NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1). Furthermore, NQO1 mRNA or protein expression in response to LPS was regulated by Nrf2. Silencing Nrf2 expression in human monocytes inhibited LPS-induced NQO1 expression; however, in contrast, it significantly increased TNF and IL-1 beta production. Silencing expression of NQO1 alone, or in combination with heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) silencing, markedly increased LPS-induced TNF and IL-1 beta expression. Additionally, overexpression of NQO1 and/or HO-1 inhibited LPS-induced TNF and IL-1 beta expression. These results show for the first time that LPS induces NQO1 and HO-1 expression in human monocytes via Nrf2 to modulate their inflammatory responsiveness, thus providing novel potential therapeutic strategies for the treatment of sepsis. The Journal of Immunology, 2008, 181: 6730-6737.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据