4.6 Article

Prevention of allograft tolerance by bacterial infection with Listeria monocytogenes

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 180, 期 9, 页码 5991-5999

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.5991

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI052464, R03 AI069284, R03 AI069284-01A2, R01 AI072630, R01 AI040310-12, U19 AI051728-050003, R01 AI040310, R01 AI 052352, R01 AI072630-02, R01 AI052464-05, R01 AI052352, R01 AI 072630, U19 AI051728] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R21 DK073529-01, R21 DK073529] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to certain viruses and parasites has been shown to prevent the induction of transplantation tolerance in mice via the generation of cross-reactive memory T cell responses or the induction of bystander activation. Bacterial infections are common in the perioperative period of solid organ allograft recipients in the clinic, and correlations between bacterial infections and acute allograft rejection have been reported. However, whether bacterial infections at the time of transplantation have any effect on the generation of transplantation tolerance remains to be established. We used the Gram-positive intracellular bacterium Listeria monocytogenes (LM) as a model pathogen because its effects on immune responses are well described. Perioperative LM infection prevented cardiac and skin allograft acceptance induced by anti-CD154 and donor-specific transfusion in mice. LM-mediated rejection was not due to the generation of cross-reactive T cells and was largely independent of signaling via MyD88, an adaptor for most TLRs, IL-1, and IL-18. Instead, transplant rejection following LM infection was dependent on the expression of the phagosome-lysing pore former listeriolysin 0 and on type I IFN receptor signaling. Our results indicate that bacterial exposure at the time of transplantation can antagonize tolerogenic regimens by enhancing alloantigen-specific immune responses independently of the generation of cross-reactive memory T cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据