4.6 Article

MyD88 regulation of Fusarium keratitis is dependent on TLR4 and IL-1R1 but not TLR2

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 181, 期 1, 页码 593-600

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.593

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [P30 EY011373, P30-EY11373, R01 EY018612, R01EY018612] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI035097-10, R01 AI035097] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01DE017486, R01DE13932, R01 DE013932, R01 DE017486] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fungal pathogens Fusarium solani and Fusarium oxysporum cause severe corneal disease in the United States and worldwide and were the causative organisms in a recent outbreak of contact lens-associated keratitis. To characterize innate immunity in Fusarium keratitis, we developed a murine model in which conidia are injected into the corneal stroma. Immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice rapidly developed severe corneal opacification associated with neutrophil infiltration and clearance of Fusarium hyphae. In contrast, neutrophil infiltration was delayed in MyD88(-/-) mice, resulting in uncontrolled growth of Fusarium hyphae in the corneal stroma and anterior chamber, and eventually resulting in corneal perforation. Corneal opacification scores in TLR2(-/-), TLR4(-/-), and TLR2/4(-/-) mice were similar to those of C57BL/6 mice; however, TLR4(-/-) and TLR2/4(-/-) mice had impaired antifungal responses. The phenotype of infected IL-1R1(-/-) mice was similar to that of MyD88-/- mice, with uncontrolled fungal growth resulting in corneal perforation. IL-1R1(-/-) mice also produced significantly less CXCL1/KC in the corneal stroma compared with C57BL/6 mice consistent with delayed neutrophil recruitment to the corneal stroma. Together, these findings indicate that IL-1R1 and MyD88 regulate CXC chemokine production and neutrophil recruitment to the cornea, and that TLR4 has an important role in controlling growth and replication of these pathogenic fungi.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据