4.6 Article

The anergic state in sarcoidosis is associated with diminished dendritic cell function

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 181, 期 1, 页码 746-755

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.746

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000096, M01 RR000096-430987, M01 RR-00096] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R21 HL077461-01, HL077461, R21 HL077461, R21 HL077461-02] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAMS NIH HHS [K23 AR002187-04, K23 AR002187-05, K23 AR002187-06] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sarcoidosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown cause, characterized by granuloma formation similar to tuberculosis, but without clear evidence of a microbial infection. Because sarcoidosis is linked with clinical anergy and other evidence of diminished cellular immunity, we hypothesized that decreased skin delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to recall Ags in affected individuals would be associated with decreased function of their blood dendritic cells (DCs). Our study involved ex vivo isolation, phenotyping, and functional testing of myeloid DCs (mDCs), plasmacytoid DCs, and T lymphocytes from blood of normal healthy volunteers and sarcoidosis subjects with active, untreated pulmonary disease. We found mDC function in the allogeneic MLR directly corresponded to the magnitude of skin DTH reactions to recall Ags in both sarcoidosis subjects and normal volunteers. However, both of these outcomes were significantly decreased in the sarcoidosis group. Diminished mDC function occurred despite up-regulated costimulatory and maturation markers. Clinical relevance is suggested by the inverse relationship between both mDC allogeneic responses and skin DTH responses with clinical disease severity as measured by chest radiograms. Because granulomas form when cellular immunity fails to clear antigenic stimuli, attenuated mDC function in sarcoidosis may contribute to susceptibility and persistence of the chronic inflammation characteristic of this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据