4.6 Article

Binding of Rituximab, Trastuzumab, Cetuximab, or mAb T101 to Cancer Cells Promotes Trogocytosis Mediated by THP-1 Cells and Monocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 181, 期 11, 页码 8120-8132

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.11.8120

关键词

-

资金

  1. James and Rebecca Craig Foundation
  2. CLL (Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia) Topics
  3. University of Virginia Cancer Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

More than 20 years ago clinical investigations in the immunotherapy of cancer revealed that infusion of certain immunotherapeutic mAbs directed to tumor cells induced loss of targeted epitopes. This phenomenon, called antigenic modulation, can compromise mAb-based therapies. Recently we reported that rituximab (RTX) treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients induced substantial loss of targeted CD20 on B cells found in the circulation after RTX infusion; this shaving of RTX-CD20 complexes from B cells is also promoted in vitro by THP-1 monocytes and by PBMC in a reaction mediated by Fey receptors. The mechanism responsible for shaving appears to be trogocytosis, a process in which receptors on effector cells remove and internalize cognate ligands and cell membrane fragments from target cells. We now report that three therapeutic mAbs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cancer, RTX, cetuximab, and trastuzumab, as well as mAb T101, which has been shown to induce antigenic modulation in the clinic, promote trogocytosis in vitro upon binding to their respective target cells. Trogocytosis of the mAb-opsonized cells is mediated by THP-1 monocytes and by primary monocytes isolated from PBMC. In view of these results, it is likely that these mAbs and possibly other anticancer mAbs now used in the clinic may promote trogocytic removal of the therapeutic mAbs and their cognate Ags from tumor cells in vivo. Our findings may have important implications with respect to the use of mAbs in cancer immunotherapy. The Journal of Immunology, 2008, 181: 8120-8132.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据