4.6 Article

Chlamydia muridarum evades growth restriction by the IFN-γ-inducible host resistance factor Irgb10

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 180, 期 9, 页码 6237-6245

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.6237

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI057831, AI 062827, AI 57831] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens that exhibit a broad range of host tropism. Differences in host tropism between Chlamydia species have been linked to host variations in IFN-gamma-mediated immune responses. In mouse cells, IFN-gamma can effectively restrict growth of the human pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis but fails to control growth of the closely related mouse pathogen Chlamydia muridarum. The ability of mouse cells to resist C. trachomatis replication is largely dependent on the induction of a family of IFN-gamma-inducible GTPases called immunity-related GTPases or IRGs. In this study we demonstrate that C. muridarum can specifically evade IRG-mediated host resistance. It has previously been suggested that C. muridarum inactivates the IRG protein Irga6 (Iigp1) to dampen the murine immune response. However, we show that Irga6 is dispensable for the control of C. trachomatis replication. Instead, an effective IFN-gamma response to C. trachomatis requires the IRG proteins Irgm1 (Lrg47), Irgm3 (Igtp), and Irgb10. Ectopic expression of Irgb10 in the absence of IFN-gamma is sufficient to reduce intracellular growth of C. trachomatis but fails to restrict growth of C. muridarum, indicating that C muridarum can specifically evade Irgb10-driven host responses. Importantly, we find that Irgb10 protein intimately associates with inclusions harboring C. trachomatis but is absent from inclusions formed by C muridarum. These data suggest that C. muridarum has evolved a mechanism to escape the murine IFN-gamma response by restricting access of Irgb10 and possibly other IRG proteins to the inclusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据