4.6 Article

IL-12 signaling drives CD8+ T cell IFN-γ production and differentiation of KLRG1+ effector subpopulations during Toxoplasma gondii infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 180, 期 9, 页码 5935-5945

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.5935

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 50618] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T lymphocytes are essential effector cells that mediate protective immunity during murine toxoplasmosis, and yet their effector development remains poorly characterized. Vaccination with the carbamoyl phosphate synthase (CPS) mutant strain of Toxoplasma gondii was used to examine the CD8(+) T cell response in the peritoneal effector site. Four CTL subpopulations with varying effector potentials were defined based on the expression of effector molecules and the cell surface activation markers CD62L and killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1). Further phenotypic analysis revealed that the acquisition of KLRG1 among effector subpopulations correlated with the down-regulation of both IL-7R and CD27, suggesting that KLRG1 marks dominant, end-stage effector cells. Using gene-targeted mice, we tested the in vivo requirements of key IL-12 signaling components for effector CTL differentiation. Contrary to established models of viral and bacterial infection, CD8(+) T cell-intrinsic IL-12 signaling was required for the generation of IFN-gamma-producing CTLs in response to T. gondii. Importantly, the development of the KLRG1(+) effector subpopulations, but not the memory precursor-containing KLRG1(-) effector subset, was critically reliant on IL-12. Furthermore, IL-12 signaling-dependent T-bet expression was also found to be important for differentiation of KLRG1(-) effectors. Our results underscore a vital role for IL-12 in not only the induction of IFN-gamma expression but also in the development of heterogeneous subpopulations of effector CD8(+) T cells generated in response to the intracellular parasite T. gondii.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据