4.6 Article

Naive and innate memory phenotype CD4+ T cells have different requirements for active Itk for their development

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 180, 期 10, 页码 6544-6552

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.10.6544

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 065566, R01 AI065566, R01 AI051626-07, R01 AI065566-03, R01 AI051626, R56 AI065566, AI 051626] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Tee family kinase Itk regulates the development of conventional and innate CD8(+) T cells. However, little is known about the role of Itk in the development of CD4(+.) T cell lineages, although the role of Itk in the T cell activation and function is well defined. We show in this study that Itk null mice have increased percentage of CD62(low)CD44(high) memory phenotype CD4(+) T cells compared with wild-type mice. These cells arise directly in the thymus, express high levels of transcripts for the T-bet and IFN-gamma and are able to produce IFN-gamma directly ex vivo in response to stimulation. Itk deficiency greatly decreases the number of CD4(+) T cells with CD62L(high)CD44(low) naive phenotype, but has no effect on the number of memory phenotype CD4(+) T cells, indicating that the development of memory phenotype CD4(+) T cells is Itk-independent. We further show that the development of the naive phenotype CD4(+) T cells is dependent on active Ilk signals and can be rescued by expression of Ilk specifically in T cells. Our data also show that Itk is required for functional TCR signaling in these cells, but not for the innate function in response to IL-12/IL-18 or Listeria monocytogenes stimulation. These results indicate that CD62L(high)CD44(low) naive CD4(+) and CD62L(low)CD44(high) innate memory phenotype CD4(+) T cells may be independent populations that differ in their requirement for Itk signals for development. Our data also suggest that CD4(+)CD62L(low)CD44(high) memory phenotype T cells have innate immune function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据