4.6 Article

Human anti-inflammatory macrophages induce Foxp3+GITR+CD25+ regulatory T cells, which suppress via membrane-bound TGFβ-1

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 181, 期 3, 页码 2220-2226

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.3.2220

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD4(+) T cell differentiation and function are critically dependent on the type of APC and the microenvironment in which Ag presentation occurs. Most studies have documented the effect of dendritic cells on effector and regulatory T cell differentiation; however, macrophages are the most abundant APCs in the periphery and can be found in virtually all organs and tissues. The effect of macrophages, and in particular their subsets, on T cell function has received little attention. Previously, we described distinct subsets of human macrophages (pro- and anti-inflammatory, m phi 1 and m phi 2, respectively) with highly divergent cell surface Ag expression and cytokine/chemokine production. We reported that human m phi 1 promote, whereas m phi 2 decrease, Th1 activation. Here, we demonstrate that m phi 2, but not m phi 1, induce regulatory T cells with a strong suppressive phenotype (T-m phi 2). Their mechanism of suppression is cell-cell contact dependent, mediated by membrane-bound TGF beta-1 expressed on the regulatory T cell (Treg) population since inhibition of TGF beta-1 signaling in target cells blocks the regulatory phenotype. T-m phi 2, in addition to mediating cell-cell contact-dependent suppression, express typical Treg markers such as CD25, glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor (GITR), and Foxp3 and are actively induced by m phi 2 from CD25-depleted cells. These data identify m phi 2 cells as a novel APC subset capable of inducing Tregs. The ability of anti-inflammatory macrophages to induce Tregs in the periphery has important implications for understanding Treg dynamics in pathological conditions where macrophages play a key role in inflammatory disease control and exacerbation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据