4.6 Article

Goblet cell-derived resistin-like molecule β augments CD4+ T cell production of IFN-γ and infection-induced intestinal inflammation

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 181, 期 7, 页码 4709-4715

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4709

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI61570, AI74878]
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund's
  3. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America's William
  4. Shelby Modell Family Foundation
  5. University of Pennsylvania Center for Infectious Diseases
  6. Cancer Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The secreted goblet cell-derived protein resistin-like molecule beta (RELM beta) has been implicated in divergent functions, including a direct effector function against parasitic helminths and a pathogenic function in promoting inflammation in models of colitis and ileitis. However, whether RELM beta influences CD4(+) Th1 cell responses in the intestine is unknown. Using a natural model of intestinal inflammation induced by chronic infection with gastrointestinal helminth Trichuris muris, we identify dual functions for RELM beta in augmenting CD4(+) Th1 cell responses and promoting infection-induced intestinal inflammation. Following exposure to low-dose Trichuris, wild-type C57BL/6 mice exhibit persistent infection associated with robust IFN-gamma production and intestinal inflammation. In contrast, infected RELM beta(-/-) mice exhibited a significantly reduced expression of parasite-specific CD4(+) T cell-derived IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha and failed to develop Trichuris-induced intestinal inflammation. In in vitro T cell differentiation assays, recombinant RELM beta activated macrophages to express MHC class II and secrete IL-12/23p40 and enhanced their ability to mediate Ag-specific IFN-gamma expression in CD4(+) T cells. Taken together, these data suggest that goblet cell-macrophage cross-talk, mediated in part by RELM beta, can promote adaptive CD4(+) T cell responses and chronic inflammation following intestinal helminth infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据