4.6 Article

Contribution of antibody and T cell-specific responses to the progression of 139A-scrapie in C57BL/6 mice immunized with prion protein peptides

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 181, 期 1, 页码 768-775

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.768

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prion diseases are associated with the conversion of the normal host cellular prion protein to an abnormal protease-resistant (PrPres) associated with infectivity. No specific immune response against prions develops during infection due to the strong tolerance to cellular prion protein. We examined the protective potential on prion diseases of immune responses elicited in C57BL/6 mice with PrP peptides 98-127 (P5) or 158-187 (P9) with CpG. After immunization, P5-treated mice developed high titer and long-lasting Abs, and P9-treated mice developed transient IFN-gamma secreting T cells and poor and variable Ab responses. Both treatments impaired early accumulation of PrPres in the spleen and prolonged survival of mice infected with 139A scrapie. Additional P9 boosts after 139A infection sustained the T cell response and partially inhibited PrPres early accumulation but did not improve the survival. Surprisingly, when P9 injections were started 1 mo after infection and repeated subsequently, specific T cell and Ab responses were impaired and no beneficial effect on prion disease was observed. After a single injection of P9, the number of IFN-gamma secreting CD4(+) T cells was also reduced in mice 8- to 10-wk postinfection compared with healthy mice. In vivo and in vitro removal of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells restored the T cell response to P9 in infected mice. In conclusion, CD4(+) T cells as well as Abs might participate to the protection against scrapie. Of importance, the peripheral accumulation of PrPres during infection negatively interferes with the development of T and B cell responses to PrP and regulatory T cells might contribute to this phenomenon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据