4.2 Article

Systematic single cell analysis of migration and morphological changes of human neutrophils over stimulus concentration gradients

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 404, 期 -, 页码 59-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2013.12.005

关键词

Chemotaxis; Chemoattractants; Imaging; Polarity; Lamellipodia; TAXIScan

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan [C-24591473]
  2. Research Fund of Kawasaki Medical School
  3. YU-ECI Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To compare the responses of individual neutrophils to chemoattractants, migration pathway data were obtained using TAXIScan, an optically accessible/horizontal apparatus in which a concentration gradient is established reproducibly for a given stimulus. The observed linear-mode trajectory pattern of neutrophils toward N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) or Interleukin (IL)-8/CXCL8 was distinguished from random migration patterns toward leukotriene (LT) 134 or platelet activating factor (PAF). The median values of velocity and directionality calculated for individual cells toward fMLP and IL-8 were both relatively similar and high, whereas the values toward LTB4 and PAF were widely dispersed over a lower range of directionality and from low to high ranges of velocity. The different patterns between the groups may be explained by unique morphology with single polarity toward fMLP and IL-8, and unstable morphology with multiple polarities toward LTB4 and PAP. Unique morphologies toward fMLP and IL-8 were not affected by coexisting LTB4 or PAF. On the other hand, the addition of suboptimum concentrations of fMLP or IL-8 to LTB4 or PAF induced a nearly maximum chemotactic response in most cells. These data suggest that exogenous formyl peptides and endogenous chemokines augment neutrophil accumulation at inflammation sites, whereas lipid mediators may play a role in supporting activation of the inflammatory cells for recruitment. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据