4.2 Article

Discrimination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci by detection of penicillin-binding protein 2 and penicillin-binding protein 2′ using a bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 388, 期 1-2, 页码 40-45

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.11.012

关键词

Coagulase-negative staphylococci; MRSA; PBP2 '; PBP2

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24790548] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the discrimination of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) or coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), we developed a bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay (BLEIA) for detecting penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) and penicillin-binding protein 2' (PBP2') using biotinylated firefly luciferase. The BLEIA was able to detect recombinant PBP2 at 50 pg/ml and recombinant PBP2' at 500 pg/ml. PBP2 and PBP2' present in the membranes of S. aureus were extracted by acid and detergent treatment. The method was able to detect PBP2 or PBP2' extracted from 10(6) colony forming units of S. aureus because of efficient extraction and the high sensitivity of luciferase. In a study of clinical isolates previously characterized as either MRSA or MSSA by antibiotic susceptibility testing, all 34 specimens identified as MRSA were both PBP2 and PBP2' positive. The 34 MSSA specimens were PBP2 positive and PBP2' negative. Moreover, the BLEIA could detect PBP2' extracted from four species of methicillin-resistant CNS, but not PBP2 extracted from four species of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible CNS. This result suggested that PBP2 could be a unique marker for discrimination of S. aureus from CNS. A BLEIA that is able to detect PBP2 and PBP2' may be useful in clinical diagnostics. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据