4.5 Article

Patients with treatment-resistant hypertension report increased stress and anxiety: a worldwide study

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 610-615

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835d6e53

关键词

anxiety; emotional stress; hypertension; survey methodology

资金

  1. Medtronic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Treatment-resistant hypertension (rHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) that remains above goal despite compliance with at least three antihypertensive medications including a diuretic all at maximum tolerated doses or BP controlled on at least four drugs. An increased risk for cardiovascular events is associated with rHTN compared with controlled hypertension (HTN). The purpose of this study was to assess the emotional impact of rHTN on patients compared with the impact of uncontrolled hypertension (uHTN). Methods: We conducted an online survey in an international cohort of 2649 patients with uHTN and 1925 patients with rHTN. Adults self-reported as having uHTN or rHTN in eight countries (Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States) responded to a series of questions about their perceptions regarding the impact of HTN on their lives. The raw data were weighted by demographic variables, the propensity for respondents to be online (except data from Brazil and Japan), and the relative population of each country surveyed. Results: Respondents from both groups reported a substantial emotional impact from HTN. People with rHTN reported consistently greater impact than patients with uHTN, including a poorer perception of their overall health, greater degree of concern over their elevated BP, and a greater impact on their everyday lives. Conclusion: In addition to the known risks to physical health, rHTN presents a substantial emotional burden to patients. An awareness of the emotional consequences of rHTN may help healthcare providers to communicate more effectively with their patients and, ultimately, to provide better care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据