4.5 Article

Arterial stiffness is increased in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 1775-1781

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283568abd

关键词

central blood pressure; inflammation; pulse wave velocity

资金

  1. European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) [ERALF 48-2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: Recent studies have reported early atherosclerosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In these patients, the chronic low-grade inflammation may predispose to vascular remodelling and arterial stiffening. We aimed at studying arterial stiffness in IBD patients. Methods: Thirty-two IBD patients without cardiovascular risk factors and 32 matched controls were enrolled (age 19-49 years). SphygmoCor device (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) was used to measure carotid-femoral and carotid-radial (muscular artery) pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index and central blood pressure. Results: Carotid-femoral PWV was higher in IBD patients than in controls (6.6 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.0 +/- 0.8 m/s, respectively, P < 0.05), as well as carotid-radial PWV (8.5 +/- 1.2 vs. 7.2 +/- 1.0 m/s, P < 0.001). Central pulse pressure was higher in IBD than in controls (32 +/- 6 vs. 28 +/- 7 mmHg, P < 0.05). Aging was an important determinant of carotid-femoral PWV in both groups and carotid-radial PWV only in IBD patients. In fully adjusted model performed in both groups of patients considered as a whole, age was positively associated with carotid-femoral PWV [R-2 = 0.10; +0.05 m/s per 1 year of aging, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.08 m/s, P < 0.05], as well as IBD (R-2 = 0.10; +0.72 m/s if IBD present, 95% CI 0.19-1.26 m/s, P < 0.05). In IBD patients, carotid-radial PWV was positively associated with the disease duration (R-2 = 0.20; +0.11 m/s per 1 year of aging, 95% CI 0.03-0.19 m/s, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Arterial stiffness is increased in patients with IBD independently of conventional cardiovascular risk factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据