4.5 Article

Blood pressure and medication changes following adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: a follow-up study

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 761-769

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328350225d

关键词

adrenalectomy; antihypertensive agents; blood pressure; follow-up studies; hyperaldosteronism; treatment outcome

资金

  1. Livelong Learning Programme Erasmus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism cures hypertension in less than 50% of patients, but improvement is observed in most of the remaining ones. Our goal was to quantify the blood pressure (BP) decrease adjusted for medication changes following adrenalectomy and to identify preoperative predictors of this outcome. Methods: We analyzed simultaneous changes in BP and medication by reviewing the records of 156 consecutive patients who had undergone adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism in one center between 2001 and 2009 for whom postoperative follow-up data were available. Results: Median [interquartile range] baseline SBP was 149 [135-160] mmHg on drugs from two [1-3] different classes. After adrenalectomy, SBP decreased by 21 [5-31] mmHg and the number of drug classes administered, by one [0-2]. The decrease in SBP, adjusted for the change in the number of drug classes, was 26 [14-36] mmHg. Each drug class dropped after surgery was equivalent to a 5 mmHg SBP decrease. Patients with higher preoperative BP or serum sodium levels experienced a greater BP decrease after adrenalectomy. Adrenalectomy cured hypertension in 68 (44%) patients. Hypertension was less likely to be cured in patients with a longer history of hypertension, higher preoperative BP levels, larger number of drug classes, or lower urinary aldosterone levels. Conclusion: Although patients with severe hypertension are likely to derive considerable benefits from adrenalectomy in terms of BP or treatment reduction, they should be warned that hypertension cure is unlikely.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据