4.5 Article

Evaluation of risk for incident hypertension using glomerular filtration rate in the normotensive general population

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 505-512

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834f6a1d

关键词

blood pressure; cohort; glomerular filtration rate; hypertension; kidney; proteinuria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The present study tested the hypothesis that glomerular filtration rate can predict the onset of hypertension in individuals with normal blood pressure in the general population. Methods: Normotensive individuals (n = 7684) who visited our hospital for a routine physical examination were enrolled in the study (4907 men; mean age 52.1 +/- 11.1 years) and were followed up with the endpoint being the development of hypertension. The relationship between estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline and the incidence of hypertension was evaluated. Results: During the follow-up period (median 4.0 years; actual follow-up 30 624 person-years), hypertension developed in 2031 participants (66.3 per 1000 person-years). After adjustment for possible risk factors, the hazard ratio of incident hypertension (first tertile as reference) in the second and third tertiles was 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.92-1.16) and 1.40 (95% confidence interval 1.26-1.57), respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, in which estimated glomerular filtration rate was taken as a continuous variable and adjustments were made for known risk factors, also indicated that baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate independently predicted the onset of hypertension (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, multiple regression analysis revealed that a longitudinal increase in SBP was significantly associated with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate after adjustment for known risk factors (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Estimated glomerular filtration rate in normotensive individuals is a good predictor of the onset of hypertension in the general population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据