4.8 Article

An air-based corrugated cavity-receiver for solar parabolic trough concentrators

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 337-345

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.050

关键词

Solar; Parabolic trough; Cavity; Receiver; Air; Heat transfer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A tubular cavity-receiver that uses air as the heat transfer fluid is evaluated numerically using a validated heat transfer model. The receiver is designed for use on a large-span (9 m net concentrator aperture width) solar parabolic trough concentrator. Through the combination of a parabolic primary concentrator with a nonimaging secondary concentrator, the collector reaches a solar concentration ratio of 97.5. Four different receiver configurations are considered, with smooth or V-corrugated absorber tube and single- or double-glazed aperture window. The collector's performance is characterized by its optical efficiency and heat loss. The optical efficiency is determined with the Monte Carlo ray-tracing method. Radiative heat exchange inside the receiver is calculated with the net radiation method. The 2D steady-state energy equation, which couples conductive, convective, and radiative heat transfer, is solved for the solid domains of the receiver cross-section, using finite-volume techniques. Simulations for Sevilla/Spain at the summer solstice at solar noon (direct normal solar irradiance: 847 W m(-2), solar incidence angle: 13.9 degrees) yield collector efficiencies between 60% and 65% at a heat transfer fluid temperature of 125 degrees C and between 37% and 42% at 500 degrees C, depending on the receiver configuration. The optical losses amount to more than 30% of the incident solar radiation and constitute the largest source of energy loss. For a 200 m long collector module operated between 300 and 500 degrees C, the isentropic pumping power required to pump the HTF through the receiver is between 11 and 17 kW. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据