4.5 Article

Dose-dependent titration of prorenin and blood pressure in Cyp1a1ren-2 transgenic rats: absence of prorenin-induced glomerulosclerosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 102-109

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f0ab66

关键词

end-organ damage; glomerulosclerosis; hypertension; prorenin; renin receptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Prorenin has been associated with cardiovascular disease and the development of glomerulosclerosis via a renin/prorenin receptor. In cyp1a1ren-2 transgenic rats, prorenin levels and arterial pressure can be increased by oral administration of indole3-carbinol (I3C). The transgenic strain has been used as a model of malignant hypertension. Methods The present study was designed to test the hypotheses that (i) low doses of I3C would result in dose-dependent sustained increases in arterial pressure without signs of malignancy, making cyp1a1ren-2 transgenic rats a useful model to study nonmalignant hypertension, and (ii) cyp1a1ren-2 transgenic rats would develop glomerulosclerosis when they were chronically exposed to 0.125% I3C in their diet. Results I3C treatment for 2 weeks resulted in increases of plasma prorenin concentrations and arterial pressure in a dose-dependent manner. Rats thrived well over a period of 12 weeks on dietary I3C concentrations (wt/wt) of 0.125%. Plasma prorenin concentration rose from 0.1 +/- 0.1mg to 17.9 +/- 5.0mg angiotensin I/ml per h ( P < 0.01) and mean arterial pressure increased to a plateau of 170 +/- 5 mmHg (P < 0.001) between weeks 6 and 12. After 12 weeks of 0.125% I3C, rats exhibited moderate hypertensive renal vasculopathy, but no histological signs of glomerulosclerosis. Conclusions The cyp1a1ren-2 transgenic rat model allows for chronic dose-dependent titration of arterial pressure by a simple and non-invasive intervention, making this strain a useful model to study malignant and nonmalignant arterial hypertension. High circulating prorenin levels per se do not cause glomerulosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据