4.7 Article

An application of hydraulic tomography to a deep coal mine: Combining traditional pumping tests with water inrush incidents

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 567, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.058

关键词

Hydraulic tomography; Pumping test; Water inrush incident

资金

  1. Qilu Youth Scholar program of Shandong University
  2. Xi'an Research Institute Company of China Coal Technology and Engineering Group
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0804102]
  4. NSFC [U1603243]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water inrush incidents threaten the safety of coal mining. Understanding of hydrogeologic parameter distributions is critical for preventing water-related hazards in coal mines. During the deep mining ( > 1000 m) under the North China Plain, water from water-bearing strata discharges into coal seams through geologic conduits (i.e. water inrush) due to the fractured zone under the floor of working faces. In this study, a water inrush incident was exploited as an active stimulus. A 3D groundwater flow model was built for the eighth member of the Middle Ordovician system in Xingdong coal mine. Using this model and an inverse approach, we first checked if the data from the incident and an independent pumping test carry non-redundant information about the heterogeneity of the mine. Afterward, we combined these datasets to conduct a large-scale (approximately 10 km) hydraulic tomography (HT) analysis. The estimated hydraulic conductivity distribution from the HT analysis is found consistent with the distribution of known geologic faults. That is, a cluster of faults is characterized as a high-conductivity zone. A high conductivity zone is identified at locations close to the water inrush location, which is the high cement consumption zone during the grouting project. Finally, results of this study promote exploiting the water inrush events as a HT survey for mapping geologic structures over a large area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据