4.7 Article

Numerical modelling of spatio-temporal thermal heterogeneity in a complex river system

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 414, 期 -, 页码 491-502

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.026

关键词

Water temperature; Arctic; Heat budget; Heat transport; Glacier; Glacial river

资金

  1. Transnational Access (ATANS) through Abisko Scientific Research Station [FP6 506004]
  2. Royal Geographical Society H.R. Mill Trust Fund [GFG 08/07]
  3. School of Geography (Leeds)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate quantification and effective modelling of water temperature regimes is fundamental to underpin projections of future Arctic river temperature under scenarios of climate and hydrological change. We present results from a deterministic two-dimensional hydrodynamic model coupled with a heat transfer model that includes horizontal advection and vertical water surface energy fluxes. Firstly, we model longitudinal, lateral and temporal thermal heterogeneity of a braided reach of an Arctic river: Karsajokk, Sweden. Model performance was assessed against water temperature data collected at 11 monitoring sites for two independent 1-week time periods. Overall, model performance was strongest (r values >0.9, RMSEs similar to 0.6 degrees C and ME <0.4 degrees C) for main channel sites with relatively deep fast-flows where water temperature was comparatively low and stable. However, model performance was poorer for sites characterised by shallow and/or temporarily-stagnant streams at the lateral margins of the braidplain, where a lag of 60-90 min persisted between the modelled and measured water temperatures. Secondly, we present novel automated statistical analyses and quantify channel thermal connectivity and complexity. Our results lead us to suggest that with further development our modelling approach offers new opportunities for scenario-based predictions of response to environmental change and to assess anthropogenic impacts on water temperature. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据