4.7 Article

The response of soil moisture to rainfall event size in subalpine grassland and meadows in a semi-arid mountain range: A case study in northwestern China's Qilian Mountains

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 420, 期 -, 页码 183-190

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.056

关键词

Qilian Mountains; Rainfall event size; Soil moisture; Grassland; Meadow

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [29Y127D11]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91025014, 91025017, 30800147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Knowledge of soil moisture is critical to understanding many of the hydrological processes that are of interest in soil hydrology, meteorology, and ecology research. In the present study, we used rainfall and soil moisture data from 2003 to 2008 measured at grassland and meadow sites in the Qilian Mountains of northwestern China to analyze the response of soil moisture to rainfall event size during the growing season. The responses of soil moisture at the grassland and meadow sites to rainfall event size were similar, although total rainfall, the frequency of large rainfall events, and the vegetation types were different. Soil moisture at depths of 20 and 40 cm increased significantly after rainfall events larger than 15 and 20 mm, respectively, but the magnitude of these changes varied in response to differences in the duration of the dry interval preceding the rain. Soil moisture at depths from 60 to 80 cm in the grassland increased obviously with rainfall events larger than 40 mm or after two consecutive large rainfall events, but was not significantly correlated with rainfall event size in the meadow. Soil moisture at depths from 120 to 160 cm did not change significantly during the growing season at either site. The soil water storage at depths from 20 to 80 cm at both sites increased obviously after rainfall events larger than 20 mm. The present results suggest that large rainfall events (>20 mm) play a key role in increasing soil water storage in the grassland and meadow ecosystems of these semi-arid mountains. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据